Was rereading Lenny’s How Duolingo Reignited User Growth and was hit by this assertion for driving growth:

Improving current user retention is more important than new user retention.

Excerpt:

We immediately saw that CURR (Current users retention rate**)** had a gigantic impact on DAU—5 times the impact of the second-best metric. In hindsight, the CURR finding made sense, because the Current User bucket has an interesting characteristic: current users who stay active return to the same bucket.

This produces a compounding effect, which means that CURR is much harder to move, but when it does, it will have a greater impact. Based on this analysis, we knew that CURR was the metric we had to move in order to get that strategic breakthrough we wanted. We decided to create a new team, the Retention Team, with CURR as its North Star metric.

One of the biggest benefits of focusing on CURR was deciding not to work on things that seemed paramount before, especially new-user retention. This was a huge mindset shift for a company that had tremendous success spending years running the bulk of its growth experiments on new users first.

After thinking about it, I strongly agree.

What does it mean to optimize current user retention?

Current user retention is mostly about people finding the app valuable and coming back.

Today, users can open the Manifold app and see some updates in market probs and a handful of interesting markets in the feed. They aim to bet in one to keep their streak, then leave.

What more of value could Manifold be providing in each user-session?

Positive visions