Immediate goal: host “Manifold Best Writeups 2022” on a Quadratic Funding system
Why implement QF?
- Could be good for consensus decisionmaking
- Solicit community opinions
- Choosing an offsite location
- What features to work on next
- Retro payments mechanism
- Overall: we don’t know, it’s fairly underexplored in the wild!
- Cool factor
- Could convince Vitalik and others to join/promote Manifold
- Could get all kinds of EA awards on the Manifold platform
- Manifold has the perfect audience for this
- Pretty simple mechanism
Decision points
- Fixed-pool QF vs scaling match pool
- Fixed-pool: Simpler
- Scaling match: Less deceptive? More subsidy for more important problems?
- Free response vs fixed choices by creator
- Free response: Allows for open calls
- Fixed choice: Prevents hijacking of the match pool
- Could allow creator to moderate/remove options?
Devlog January 11, 2023
- Periodic reminder not to upgrade
firebase-tools
: 11.20.0 broke yarn deploy
, fix was to downgrade to 11.17.0
Dev Considerations January 17, 2023
- naming: QF vs Qf vs QuadFund. Casing gets annoying to remember.
- [x] Think all Qf & qf is better, with “Quadratic Funding” shown to others. Kill “QF”
- txn type:
certId
vs qfId
vs just contractId
- Can find certs vs qfs via
qfId !== null
- but could also have done
category === "QFPayment" or category === "QFTip"
etc
- Also in code: call it
qf
vs contract
?
V0