Google Meet
Updates
What got done
What next?
[J] James
- Delete market doesn’t work for > 2 traders
- Cut multi trader and liquidity bonuses
- Max 100 answers for multi
- Flip question to be first on market page and related card
- Fix user props not denormalized in dpm sell bet
James
- Fix multi formula for adding subsidy
- Fix league score incorrect for dpm?
[s] Stephen
- fix resolution exploit!
- feed card tweaks
- Finished rebranding Manifold Markets ⇒ Manifold
- add live feed
- make tabs scroll to top!
- tweak importance score
- add to coup story
- stop bots from redeeming bots
- Add M200 to cost of private markets
Stephen
- homepage changes
- pay aella
[i] Ian
- speed up new user feed gen, should fix white screen of death, have to test
- refresh feed when scroll to top
- feed card tweaks
- fix stonk sell bug
- deal with firstuserhere fraud
Ian
- push tab status to query
- gambling embedding?
- lower feed comment adds to users who have many unseen feed rows
[c] Sinclair
- multi choice chart merged
- fix bugs - creating market in group, resolved bets not being filtered out on the client
Sinclair
[D] David
David
[iw] Inga
- tried to clean up market page
- bountied question brainstorming
Inga
Demos
- [c] multi choice chart
- [s] It’s a little smaller than it was, which makes it much better than before
- [s] still think link preview should just show options
- [i] Confusing and not pretty, lacks a legend which makes it unclear
- Don’t see a stacked line chart elsewhere, not sure what it means.
- [s] answer panel is the legend
- [i] I didn’t expect this or understand it until you said so.
- [s] we’ll need a line chart for non mut-ex MC markets soon…
- [c] Want to build a time-scrubber to play back the entire market
Blockers
Discussion
- [i] Mark contract as gambling, not unlisted. Any contract can be marked as gambling. When marked as gambling, its embedding is averaged into the gambling embedding. Upon creation, any contract close enough to the gambling embedding is also marketd as gambling.
- [s] A good idea, but from a regulatory perspective we shouldn’t label anything as gambling.
- Any other euphemisms?
- [i] non-predictive [s] +1
- [c] meta. recursive.
- markets about whether ball will land on red or black are actually ok. main issue is with markets that incentivize their own activity, which games the metrics and creates incentives that we didn’t design that might not be very fun.
- [J] Kind of agree.
- When marked as gambling, leagues profits and bonuses discounted.
- [c] think it should either be 0 or not - easier to reason about
- [i] sounds good
- Saves Salty time bc he won’t have to do this, people can gamble if they want, and other people can just hide the market if they don’t want to see them
- [c] may cause people to make gambling markets worded more creatively. I think it will decrease a lot of low effort ones though
- [s] +1
- [i] If they get too confusing people will probably ignore them
- [s] I still think part of the best long term solution is having House-sponsored daily markets: Quick markets
- [J] Deciding which are non-predictive markets will be a never-ending task…
- [i] at least this gets rid of 80% of the ones I see currently
- [J] Is using embeddings better than having community member tag all these markets?